|
Games
May 11, 2004 16:33:54 GMT -5
Post by Bash on May 11, 2004 16:33:54 GMT -5
I 2nd that mate...
Bash
|
|
|
Games
May 21, 2004 12:46:29 GMT -5
Post by Pikaflu on May 21, 2004 12:46:29 GMT -5
ut2k4 is ok but the guns are so poopy
|
|
|
Games
May 21, 2004 12:56:53 GMT -5
Post by Nightwalker on May 21, 2004 12:56:53 GMT -5
I heard that UT 2004 is better than 2003, the vehicles make it good apprently, but its still not as good as the original This is only what I have heard I havent had a chance to play on it yet!
|
|
|
Games
Jul 16, 2004 5:32:30 GMT -5
Post by EpiLePTiCFaiRY on Jul 16, 2004 5:32:30 GMT -5
I played UT2k4 at a cafe in Manchester.. the computers they have there are only a year old and we had to turn everything right down to get 20fps! Poopy indeed... Suffice to say, I don't think many people will be able to run this game smoothly. This is probably the reason CS is played so much, the fact that nearly everyone can achieve 100fps makes it more the skill of the player than the power of their machinery that wins the match - the games suggested may well be good games, but would put several people at a disadvantage, which would make them moan!
Anyway, why can't you guys play 2 different games at once? I hear you have gatherings of about 20 people. I know battlefield would suck with only 10 in a server, but UT2k4 has small maps to compensate for small player numbers.
|
|
|
Games
Jul 17, 2004 9:37:10 GMT -5
Post by Nightwalker on Jul 17, 2004 9:37:10 GMT -5
we're up for any game, luckly my PC should run UT2k4 smooth as silk. We have 35ppl booked for our next event, so plenty of BFV, CS, UT etc. D.Servers for me and Dan to be working on
|
|